WTA US Open Preview

US OPEN NEWS & NOTES

*There won’t be a repeat champion in New York this year with Kichenok-Ostapenko no longer pairing up. The 7th seeds from 2024 took the titles as 1.62 (-161) favorites in the title match over unseeded Mladenovic-Zhang. Favorites and underdogs have rotated wins since 2019 with the odd years seeing the dogs eat and the even years going to the favorites. The straight sets finish (6-4, 6-3) was the second in a row and fourth time in the last six years that the US Open final has ended in two sets.

*A seeded pair has now won four straight since Zvonareva-Siegemund sprung the surprise in 2020 as unseeded champions. It has not been a good omen to be seeded first in New York. 2016 was the last time that the top seeds made the final and they have not won the championship since 2015 (Hingis-Mirza). In the nine years since that Hingis-Mirza victory, a top four seed has won just three titles. The last came in 2022 when Krejcikova-Siniakova won as the three seeds.

*With that lack of success, how have seeds fared in New York recently? For the most part, seeds have done well at avoiding upsets in round one with a notable exception. The #2 seeded pair has lost their opener in four straight runs of the US Open. A top five seed has been bounced in round one each year since 2020. Unseeded pairs have been regular party crashers in the latter stages in New York with multiple unseeded quarter finalists each of the last three years with one grabbing a semifinal spot in that same span as you see in the chart below

*Underdogs won 18 matches in 2024 out of 62 completed. Not surprisingly, eight of those came in the opening round. That’s still a decent showing despite the larger number of matches (32) with dogs taking 25 percent of those openers. The three largest scores came at 3.69 (+269), 4.17 (+317) and 4.22 (+322). The biggest dog hit from last year came in round two at 5.23 (+4.23) when (6)Errani-Paolini were erased by Dart-Parry. Round two isn’t a bad place to focus on grabbing a juicier dog with multiple top ten seeds going out in round two in four of the last six runs of the US Open. The quarterfinals also look like a sneaky good spot to focus on underdogs with seven of the last dozen quarterfinals going the way of the dog.

*Three set matches hit 20 times last year, so about 32 percent of the matches. Round one featured the most with 13. The total was actually down from 26 three set matches in 2023. Round one also hit with exactly 13 matches going the distance. Looking back to 2022, you can tally another year where round one yielded at least 13 three set matches.
If you’re looking for a trend within the trend, 17 of those round one matches that went the distance between 2022-2024 involved a seeded pair. Both the quarterfinals and semifinals have been a bit wonky as far as a definitive trend with regards to three setters, but we have seen multiple quarterfinals go three in three of the last four years. Last year was the exception with just one.

*It will be interesting to see if 2025 breaks the spell over the top two seeds that has kept them out of the Winner’s Circle more often than not over the last decade. Siniakova-Townsend are your #1 seeds. Last year as three seeds, they did make the semifinals before being upset by Mladenovic-Zhang. As supremely talented as they are, they have missed out on the final in three of the five Grand Slams where they have paired since the start of 2024. Errani-Paolini as the two seeds also look like they might fit into that trend of missing out on the final in New York. The Italians have been their best on clay obviously with the French Open titles this year, but they’ve crashed out in round two at both the Australian Open and Wimbledon. If you go back to 2024, it’s a similar story with the French Open final being their Grand Slam highlight and nothing better than a round of 16 finish at the other three Slams. They’re certainly a quality team, but one that seems a bit more vulnerable on non-clay surfaces from week to week. They are 23-14 on hard courts over ther last two seasons, but have only been to three finals out of 17 tournaments played on the surface in that span.

THE UNSEEDED MENACES

While the unseeded pairs may not necessarily be productive in eliminating seeds in round one too frequently of late, they definitely have shown enough that you would expect to see a few in the last eight and perhaps beyond. Here are the pairs that stick out to me as our key UNSEEDED MENACES in New York this year.

Kostyuk-Ruse
It’s a Grand Slam, so here they are again on the list. Their best run this year came on hard courts at the Australian Open where this seasoned pair made the quarterfinals. This will be their third go at the US Open and they own a 3-1 record. They’re in a tough quarter with Wimbledon champs Kudermetova-Mertens and Siegemund-Haddad Maia in close proximity, but I guarantee you that the seeds would rather not see them if they had their choice. They’re still a sleeper pair to watch.

Hunter-Krawczyk
The record has been disappointing for these two (1-3) in limited play this year, but they have been in each match with a shot to win. Three of their four matches went to super tie breaks. If they can get out of the gates with a win, that could be the confidence boost they need. The two doubles vets would be on a collision course with (5)Andreeva-Shnaider in round two, which could be a real banger in waiting.

Krejcikova-Ostapenko
It’s almost criminal that this duo is unseeded, but that’s the case since they have only paired for three tournaments. Ostapenko obviously has the fond memory of winning here last year with Kichenok, so she’ll be keen on trying her own brand of repeat. They’re 5-1 this year and could well have a title if not for a pair of withdrawals due to singles getting in the way either due to injury or a deeper run. They’ll have a chance to take out a seed right away as they meet (12)Babos-Stefani in round one. A win to open will announce what everyone already knows, this pair could be a true contender. The caveat of course will be managing their singles runs with making a potential deep doubles run.

Dolehide-Kenin
This could be a perfect storm scenario for the Americans playing on home soil. They’ve done nothing but win since pairing up in Berlin this Summer. The Americans are 9-3 with a Wimbledon quarterfinal, a Washington final and a Montreal semifinal to show for their work. They’re in a tough quarter, but I would not underestimate their chances to make a deep run based on what we’ve seen from them so far.

Kessler-Stearns/Cirstea-Kalinskaya
Sound the BANGER ALERT in round one when these two square off. Yes, Kessler-Stearns are pairing for the first time, but both have shown great ability on the doubles courts. Kessler recently won in Montreal paired with Gauff, a tournament where Kessler may have actually been the best player on the court more often than not. Cirstea-Kalinskaya had a tough opener in Cincinnati, losing a tight one to Kichenok-Perez, but the rest of their 2025 shows their dangerous intent. They stunned the draw in Madrid for the titles in their first tournament together and followed that up with a solid quarterfinal run at Wimbledon. I really like the survivor of this one to challenge Errani-Paolini in the final quarter, one that might spring a surprise semifinalist.

ONE AND DONE WATCH

While the opening round upsets have been fewer of late, a top six seed has been a round one upset victim each year since 2019. Let’s take a look at the round one matches where seeds look most prone to an upset.

(5)Andreeva-Shnaider
The Russians haven’t been as consistent as we’ve come to expect lately. They have dropped two of their last three openers, but that was on grass. That seems to be their least favorite surface, so a return to hard courts may really negate this perceived upset potential. They take on Dart-Putintseva, a first-time pair. Both players have been tough outs with a variety of partners in 2025. Perhaps this would be a tougher foe a few rounds in, but there’s also been times when the Russians have been most vulnerable early on. This one carries some intrigue to me.

(7)Muhammad-Schuurs
They avoided an opening loss in Cincinatti, but just barely as they escaped in a super tie break against Hunter-Krawczyk. They have dropped their opener in two of their last four tournaments after mostly avoiding the one and done scenario. They draw the Corley sisters in round one. Don’t sleep on these two as they pushed Kudermetova-Mertens to a third set in round two here last year. They showed their danger in Cleveland again as they lost to French Open runners-up Danilina-Krunic 6-4, 6-7, 10-8 in round two. I expect a competitive battle in this one as hard courts have been the best surface for the Americans by far, going 23-10 the last two seasons.

(11)Babos-Stefani
A brutal draw for the seeds here with Krejcikova-Ostapenko in round one. Babos-Stefani have only lost their openers twice in 2025, both coming on clay back in May. They have also won some very tough openers this season, so perhaps it’s a proving point for them. Still, this might one of the most harsh round one matchups on the board.

(12)Alexandrova-Zhang
I’m a fan of this combination, but they do have a tough starter against Cristian-Moratelli. That pair has gone 7-4 over the past two seasons, including a third round appearance here a year ago. Alexandrova-Zhang have never lost an opener in four career tournaments together, but this might be their toughest draw yet.

(13)Bucsa/Melichar-Martinez
They absolutely destroyed the competition en route to a title in Monterrey, that included a 6-2, 6-0 crush job against a very good team in Guo-Panova. The question of course is did they capture lightning-in-a-bottle there or is this a pairing that truly has the chemistry to be a contender again on a bigger stage this time? They get nine-time Grand Slam champ Hsieh Su-Wei with her latest hard court partner in Ashlyn Krueger. This is the one Slam title missing from Hsieh’s trophy case as she seeks to complete a career Grand Slam in doubles. A win to start would certainly give her some hope. This will be an interesting one to see if Hsieh-Krueger can mesh and cause trouble right off the bat.

(15)Mihalikova-Nicholls
Even though this looks like a pretty winnable match on paper, the 15 seeds have been well off their best this Summer. They have lost their opener in six of their last seven tournaments and five straight. It’s Osorio-Yuan to start, which theoretically should set them up for success. That pairing will play for the first time together and neither has played a ton of doubles this year. Yuan did win a title in Austin with Blinkova, so the talent is there. Given Mihalikova-Nicholls’ struggles, this might be more of a fight than most would expect.

DRAW PREVIEW

Click HERE for the women’s draw

TOP HALF

First Quarter
(1)Siniakova-Townsend are the lead seeds here and will be seeking to make a 5th semifinal out of six Grand Slam tournaments played. They have yet to be stopped short of a quarterfinal at Slams over the last two years. There shouldn’t be much concern that they did not play together over the North American hard court swing this Summer. They didn’t play any prep tournaments before Wimbledon and made another semifinal in London. Their draw looks fairly locked in to make at least the quarterfinals with this set up, assuming good health follows them. (15)Mihalikova-Nicholls would be the only seeds in their path to a quarterfinal.

Do remember that Siniakova-Townsend did drop a set in three of their four matches in New York last year, so it may not be a simple road overall. Keep an eye on Birrell-Gadecki who they could see in round two. The Aussies are 3-2 in Grand Slam play, but both of those came in Australia. This will actually be their first time pairing outside of their home country, but they certainly have shown some chemistry. If the setting isn’t too much, they definitely could be ones to watch. Don’t twist it though. Siniakova-Townsend will be hugely disappointed if they fail to make a quarterfinal with this draw.

In the other half of this quarter, it’s (6)Kichenok-Perez and (12)Alexandrova-Zhang as the seeds. Kichenok-Perez may face a challenge in round one with Venus Williams pairing with Leylah Fernandez as wild card entries. We know who the crowd will side with, but will it be enough? Kichenok-Perez are 10-5 this year together, but I think are missing a true signature run. They did make the Bad Homborg final on grass and narrowly lost a super tie break to Dabrowski-Routliffe in the Cincy semifinals. The talent is there, but can they capitalize on a draw that does lend one to believe they have a good shot at making a quarterfinal. If they escape a raucous crowd in round one and Fernandez-Williams, their path should be more clear.

Eikeri-Hozumi could be an unseeded pair to look at in this section IF things fall apart a bit. That’s really how they crafted their way into the French Open semifinals with a very unexpected run. In the Alexandrova-Zhang half, the seeds may also face their toughest challenge to start. I already outlined the danger I think Cristian-Moratelli bring to that contest. The 12th seeds are a true wildcard if you’re comfortable using that for a seeded pair. They beat Errani-Paolini on clay, but were also beaten straight forwardly by Dabrowski-Routliffe in that same tournament and by Hsieh-Ostapenko on grass. Can they rise up against the best of the best?

It would take a monumental upset or an injury do keep the top seeds from getting to the quarterfinals with this draw. Siniakova-Townsend may not be dominant all the time, but there’s nothing in their path in my estimation that looks like a pair they cannot handle. The question for me is who would they face in a quarterfinal? There are some bumps in the paths of both seeds in the other half and some consistency questions perhaps. For me, I really feel like if Kichenok-Perez get out of round one, then they’re set up for success. Cristian-Moratelli are the ones I’d watch out for if an unseeded pair makes a surprise run in that section. I like their experience here from last year and they’ve continued to be a quality team in 2025.

My Favorite: Siniakova-Townsend
My Sleeper: Cristian-Moratelli

Second Quarter
This quarter is book ended with (5)Andreeva-Shnaider in one half and Wimbledon champs (4)Kudermetova-Mertens in the other. Let’s start with Kudermetova-Mertens who have looked a bit more human on hard courts this Summer, going 2-2. I wouldn’t say losses to Krejcikova-Ostapenko and Guo-Panova rank as poor, but the air of invincibility that followed them earlier in the season has dissipated some. That said, their early draw in this section looks like an absolute dream. Lamens-Lys, their first round foes, are a combined 1-8 in doubles play in 2025. Round two will hand them a huge experience advantage over a pair of young wild card teams. The Americans, Brantmeier-Hamilton, are the ones expected to advance. They have a bit of experience together, but they’ll surely be at a huge disadvantage if they face Kudermetova-Mertens.

As for Haddad Maia-Siegemund, the other seeds in this half, they could get tested by Joint-McNally in round one. Those two looked good in a pair of super tie break matches in Montreal, going 1-1. Haddad Maia-Siegemund did lose an opener for the first time in Montreal, but that was a product of an extremely rough draw against Kudermetova-Mertens. I expected better in this spot, albeit this could go three sets. Sign me up for that revenge match in the round of 16 if both seeds hold. Kudermetova-Mertens won that Montreal meeting 6-4, 4-6, 10-8. Give the V for victory and vendetta to Haddad Maia-Siegemund if they get another shot. I’d expect another banger that goes the distance in that one as well. Do remember that Kostyuk-Ruse could be lurking in round two however to go up against Haddad Maia-Siegemund.

(5)Andreeva-Shnaider start with Dart-Putintseva. I highlighted that as a potential one and done, but I still have the Russians squeezing through to round two. They’re far more comfortable on this surface than they are on grass, so I’m willing to overlook that sketchy stretch for them. Round two won’t be much easier if Hunter-Krawczyk are able to get through. I talked about them being a potential unseeded menace IF they can grab an early win. I feel like that confidence is what might be missing from them really getting going. Americans Baptiste-Osuigwe play the US Open for the fourth straight year. They’ve only been past the opening round once. It’s another tough draw for them, but with Hunter-Krawczyk still seeking consistency, that one might be highly competitive. Andreev-Shnaider didn’t play New York last year, but their big tournament record speaks for itself: Olympic final, Australian Open semifinal, French Open semifinal. Outside of Wimbledon where the still made the round of 16, they’ve been nails at Slams. Look for them to be in position for another quarterfinal.

On the other side of the Russians’ half, (10)Chan-Jiang could be a sneaky seed. They come in hot off making the Cleveland final and have the draw to ease into the round of 16. Aoyama-Wang are first up and then it would be one of two first-timers in Golubic-Li or Bronzetti-Piter. While you never know if one of those will gel and become a real threat, you have to like the experience edge of the seeded pair here. Aoyama-Wang are probably the bigger test, but they’ve only played a few matches together in their careers. I think if there was a surprise in this section, they’d most likely be the ones to spring it. Overall though, this half really should belong to the pair that emerges from that Andreeva-Shnaider half. This is a good set up for them with most of the pairs looking like ones who will struggle to match their power. Hunter-Krawczyk are the one crafty veteran duo that I would like to see them have to get through. That’s really been the calling card of pairs that challenge them the most.

My Favorite: Andreeva-Shnaider
My Sleeper: Haddad Maia-Siegemund

BOTTOM HALF

Third Quarter
This quarter houses 2023 champions Dabrowski-Routliffe, who are seeded third. The question here is what version of that pair do we get? The ones who impressed in winning the titles in Cincinnati or the ones who lost tight matches in round one at Monteal and round two in Cleveland last week? You have to like that despite their struggles from week to week, they have still been showing out at Grand Slams. They made the Australian Open semifinals and then got to the quarterfinals at Wimbledon. If you go back to their 2023 US Open run where they announced their presence, that quarterfinal at Wimbledon is their WORST Grand Slam result. Don’t expect them to flame out early. There are a slew of challengers in their half of this quarter though that could keep them from continuing that Slam quarterfinal streak.

You’ve got (13)Bucsa/Melichar-Martinez taking on Hsieh-Krueger in round one in that other half. In the match opposite of theirs, Dolehide-Kenin are ones to watch as they square off with Linette-Shibahara. Linette-Shibahara would be the biggest stunner if they made it through this section. I still tend to like Dolehide-Kenin as outsiders to make the run. The X-factor here is obviously Hsieh-Krueger. It’s another choice by Hsieh to pair with a player you wouldn’t expect to be her partner, but she’s proven capable of winning with anyone. One thing is for sure, she’ll have fan support in this section – perhaps even if it came down to her and Krueger against Dolehide-Kenin. I don’t want to sleep on that Bucsa/Melichar-Martinez pairing after they won in Monterrey, but I think they’re going to have a tough time getting through two rounds with this draw. Any team that gets through this gauntlet is going to have a shot against Dabrowski-Routliffe, but it’s still hard to pick against them with their sparkling Slam resume.

The other half of the quarter has two fairly under-the-radar seeds in (8)Guo-Panova and (11)Babos-Stefani. If you’re a regular reader of mine, you’ll know that I’ve touted Guo-Panova most of the Summer as a danger duo. It’s hard to look past them with this run of results: Montreal quarterfinals, Cincinnati final, Cleveland final. You can question how they might fare against the top tier duos, but against the competition in this part of the quarter, they should match up well. The most threatening unseeded pair in their path could be Xu-Yang. They did lose head-to-head on grass in Bad Homborg against Guo-Panova, but have looked tough on hard courts this Summer. Their four losses with in super tie breaks to Muhammad-Routliffe, twice to Babos-Stefani and to Chan-Jiang in Cleveland last time out. They likely are the toughest potential out for the #8 seeds in this half.

On the other side, Babos-Stefani have the misfortune of drawing Krejcikova-Ostapenko in round one. I don’t think they’ll be entirely overwhelmed, but a loss won’t come as a surprise with the seed opening as 3.14 (+214) underdogs in this one. The survivor of that opener is going to have a much better set up in round two and will definitely be expected to be in round three fighting for a quarterfinal berth. Krejcikova-Ostapenko are going to be a popular pick to get into the quarters I believe and with just cause. I’d love to see the Guo-Panova/Krejcikova-Ostapenko match we didn’t get in Cincinnati due to Krejcikova’s withdrawal. That’s a proving ground match for Guo-Panova in this quarter for sure. If Babos-Stefani somehow manage to survive, we could get a repeat of their Wimbledon round two banger against Guo-Panova. Babos-Stefani survived that one in three sets.

Dabrowski-Routliffe will be the obvious favorites in this quarter, but there is A LOT of traffic in their path to getting to a quarterfinal or further. Round three figures to be the first big test and the variety of match-ups they would see in a quarterfinal figure to be one of the toughest spots of the tournament to that point. There are several of my UNSEEDED MENACES in this quarter, so nothing is set in stone as far as who is going to advance. This might be the toughest quarter in the draw given the quality of some of these unseeded pairs.

My Favorite: Dabrowski-Routliffe
My Sleeper: Krejcikova-Ostapenko

Fourth Quarter
The final quarter is spearheaded by the second seeds Errani-Paolini. The Italians have struggled outside of the French Open when it comes to Grand Slam results. Outside of their championship run this year in Paris, they have failed to make it past the third round at any of the other three Slams. That includes being bounced in round two in New York in their US Open debut last year. Their Summer hard court swing was mediocre at 3-2 with straight sets losses in Montreal to Krejcikova-Ostapenko and in the semifinals in Cincinnati to Guo-Panova. I don’t think they’ll fall victim to the second seed curse in recent years here in losing in round one with Boisson-Maria teaming up for the first time to face them in round one. Round two is a different story though with Kessler-Stearns or Cirstea-Kalinskaya waiting. Cirstea-Kalinskaya have already shown their ability to knock off the cream of the crop with wins over Dabrowski-Routliffe, Hsieh-Ostapenko, Kudermetova-Mertens and Andreeva-Shnaider this season. Kessler-Stearns are the wildcards having not played together in the past, but a win over that team in round one would signal they are big threats. I’d be surprised if the second seeded Italians make it past round two.

Khromacheva-Rakhimova are the 16th seeds in the other part of this half. They square off with Stollar-Wu in round one. I didn’t put the seeds on my one and done list, but truly it would not be a surprise if they fall in round one. They’ve teamed up just five times, going 1-3. Stollar-Wu are 0-3 this year. Kato-Zarazua may be the unseeded pair to keep track of in this section. They are only 3-3 as a tandem, but all three wins came at the Australian Open in a shock quarterfinal run earlier this year. They should have an edge over Masarova-Pavlyuchenkova in round one. If they get through, they might be the favorites in round two no matter who they face. This really looks like a wide open portion of the draw. You’d normally give Errani-Paolini the nod to advance, but those are some tough unseeded pairs in their path. Plus they haven’t shown the same prowess off clay at Grand Slams to feel comfortable of them taking advantage even if the draw looked a bit better.

In the top half of the quarter, (7)Muhammad-Schuurs and (9)Danilina-Krunic are the seeded pairs. Have been up and down this season at 21-15 with two titles. They made round three at both the Australian and French Opens before falling in round two at Wimbledon. I do think the Corleys in round one will be a stiff test right out of the gates. Noskova-Sramkova may be next in line to pose a significant threat if the seeds advance. That pair made their 2025 debut at Wimbledon, losing in round one. They came back for their second tournament in Monterrey in the week prior to the start of the US Open. A win over Dabrowski-Routliffe in their semifinal push should sound the alarm to everyone that these two can ball. They did withdraw in the semis down 4-1 to Guo Panova, but both played a singles match already in New York and made it through. Health should not be an issue. They do need to get past Olmos-Siskova first. Those two are both skilled doubles players, but this will be their first time together.

In the Danilina-Krunic section, the French Open runners-up have proven their Paris success is no fluke. They won the titles in Cleveland in the US Open build-up and their two losses this Summer were in super tie breaks to Townsend-Zhang and Krejcikova-Ostapenko. I don’t see a huge threat to them getting into the round of 16 with this set up. They could win up seeing Zheng-Zhu for the second straight tournament. They whipped them 6-2, 6-1 in Cleveland. Niculescu-Sevastova are their opponents in round one. That might be a toss up against Zheng-Zhu in round one. In any case, I like Danilina-Krunic to push forward for a shot at another Slam quarterfinal. They’re my favorites to get through here no matter if it’s Muhammad-Schuurs or one of the unseeded pairs in their path.

I really favor this quarter to feature a seed versus an unseeded pair in the quarterfinals. Danilina-Krunic are the seeds I like best. I really think the survivor between Kessler-Stearns and Cirstea-Kalinskaya will have the best chance to scoot through to the other quarterfinal slot. Kato-Zarazua would be the deep dark horses.

My Favorite: Danilina-Krunic
My Sleeper: Cirstea-Kalinskaya

CLOSING TIME

Outside of the pandemic version of the US Open in 2020, a seed has taken the titles in New York every year since 2006. That doesn’t mean it’s necessarily going to be one of the top three or four seeds though with just two top four seeds winning since 2018. For my numerologists out there, a double digit seed has won each of the last two US Opens held in odd years with the 16th seeds winning in 2023 and 14th seeds in 2021.

It’s hard to look past Siniakova-Townsend, but Kudermetova-Mertens could loom as challengers in a semifinal. I’m less inclined to like Andreeva-Shnaider if that’s the matchup, but the Russians did push the top seeds to three sets in their Australian Open semifinal battle this year. The double digit seed that could be lurking as the pair best suited to knocking off the top seeds are (14)Haddad Maia-Siegemund. They’ve lost twice to them in 2025 on hard courts with a 10-7 scoreline in super tie breaks in both instances. Could the third time be a charm?

In the bottom half, Dabrowski-Routliffe have the Slam pedigree, but also a degree of inconsistency this year that makes them a bit more of a stretch to take perhaps. The seeded pair I really do like in this half is Danilina-Krunic. Let’s not forget they own a win over Siniakova-Townsend at the French Open. Cirstea-Kalinskaya might be at the top of the list for unseeded finals runners in that half, but keep your eyes on the two American pairs with Dolehide-Kenin and Kessler-Stearns. It’s been a few years since an American made the final, but there was a stretch from 2020 to 2022 where at least one American was involved in the final. Could that trend return in 2025?

I think we’re set for a fascinating week and a half in New York. The last Grand Slam of the season seems to almost always produce a surprise near the end. Last year it was Mladenovic-Zhang knocking out Siniakova-Townsend in the semifinals that may have had the most to do with opening the door for Kichenok and Ostapenko to win the titles. In 2023, it was Dabrowski-Routliffe rising up as the 16th seeds to claim the titles. 2022 was the last time when you can say things went the way you’d probably expect when the Czech Doubles Queens Krejcikova-Siniakova won it all. 2020 and 2021 were back on that surprise track with Siegemund-Zvonareva in 2020 and (14)Stosur-Zhang in 2021. Expect the unexpected. Let’s get crazy with these picks.

PIG PIX

Danilina-Krunic
Haddad Maia-Siegemund
Krejcikova-Ostapenko